Return-Path: <denverh2000@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: craig@sbc-85.com
Received: from gator4254.hostgator.com
	by gator4254.hostgator.com with LMTP
	id QLNRH9+yBmSLLwUAcizydQ
	(envelope-from <denverh2000@gmail.com>)
	for <craig@sbc-85.com>; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 21:43:27 -0600
Return-path: <denverh2000@gmail.com>
Envelope-to: craig@sbc-85.com
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 21:43:27 -0600
Received: from mail-io1-f51.google.com ([209.85.166.51]:47066)
	by gator4254.hostgator.com with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
	(Exim 4.95)
	(envelope-from <denverh2000@gmail.com>)
	id 1pZOEZ-001V03-35
	for craig@sbc-85.com;
	Mon, 06 Mar 2023 21:43:27 -0600
Received: by mail-io1-f51.google.com with SMTP id g6so4939460iov.13
        for <craig@sbc-85.com>; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 19:43:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678160596;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date
         :message-id:from:references:to:subject:from:to:cc:subject:date
         :message-id:reply-to;
        bh=qBsyeGt+HytLvIIwaNEggi2IfmFyzenU2gO4gHEoXO4=;
        b=nT9lSdkvSkxtaAzWG6S9HtUomAzkNwu7E3Y2hhWWf+kI4VJyE+h3kJjEOLXzVT7Nb2
         vqcxrokhEpnm9g1+enj1aG19ssghnb/oMUzLFisi0ziyAxLSLPvgo1Bc4TVodG78wzAJ
         HsOp5c51+DIqzwzgN+hbl+fYkbi6GIMotEi+IhquS8JCZKFeFytv+pt1Obc2UXTwVvFl
         sCZD045Cag8grvYxkZv8Wsa/w8KY18Y5Heg9ceCY3jK8Ezrl6xMFBurVzq1YPfhqEfk5
         FIQYhz63myIcwoftc158/xAdP5PHWLl+J4AyVvdK8FSKptoZsNworJU1HKkK5DDrzOme
         LkwA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678160596;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date
         :message-id:from:references:to:subject:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
         :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=qBsyeGt+HytLvIIwaNEggi2IfmFyzenU2gO4gHEoXO4=;
        b=D0VfmVGL6i/JBJunc1Fir9oNMaY7bLUIjj84GtihSSpeOcSvu7OZTy5ahi5Hieii7o
         7dLCfh2NeapbxA5FsmP1rZN0AKgHtLkATub4E3Edj2YfvJvXnjb9M4rel69ywBv49Z9y
         8NiAYqSccznSBFYS7VcQFFvTqa71Lpja9Uc2uHxurRViF12xGRERUfAdxxWTxxWx76Dt
         VvxZgNti8ayAiyOAdV0gofcbI5R3eRKA9td1e1TlGxUa3he9u7PC8WHj9cfnXmQwIL2C
         fbp5YPsaoiNbZfoBSa0Dza3ZqhaVPRcJXK8U8aNesKqLY+c1uFADOpeM0xgxxp9aFZxB
         2/ZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVIX9kf01iQe2IdZWptvkdmsJzqdj8uiOjmOdMdmal3smVfnfmB
	v38GjnTw+R8iAn3fbuCuuZfYHyiHiA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+dKM7Rg8YQqdNK026+oHnWZjRI6dKGtN5aiSQ+2XwiNHkUtAQZagLOHPMO8zLk2mKuaNQm1Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e210:0:b0:74c:7db1:7894 with SMTP id z16-20020a6be210000000b0074c7db17894mr9255700ioc.0.1678160596074;
        Mon, 06 Mar 2023 19:43:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhbsd.lan ([68.235.43.22])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10-20020a92340a000000b00310f9a0f8a7sm3288031ila.76.2023.03.06.19.43.15
        for <craig@sbc-85.com>
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 06 Mar 2023 19:43:15 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: FDOS & TEA
To: craig@sbc-85.com
References: <96042fce-d324-4e10-ac57-7cfb7c03260b@gmail.com>
 <87F3797F-3472-4A85-9284-61E072510C94@sbc-85.com>
 <274e5aaf-3152-5e6f-b3ce-cf47be9c37df@gmail.com>
 <06bd01d95081$da884ff0$8f98efd0$@sbc-85.com>
 <dd25256b-96d7-7867-e8c8-72d264988eac@gmail.com>
 <07e901d95093$6c486a40$44d93ec0$@sbc-85.com>
 <9fbef623-3d62-cebe-34e8-a0b81b72ada7@gmail.com>
 <088401d950a1$99b987d0$cd2c9770$@sbc-85.com>
From: denverh <denverh2000@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4a46f807-726b-6696-a158-078a00f5b44f@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 21:43:14 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/68.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <088401d950a1$99b987d0$cd2c9770$@sbc-85.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8
X-Spam-Score: 18
X-Spam-Bar: +
X-Spam-Flag: NO

craig@sbc-85.com wrote:
> I include the person I call 'future me' among those in the "not everyone knows as much" category.  'Future me' is not nearly as bright as 'past me', so 'current me' has to look out for him.  I can't count the number of times that I couldn't go back and figure out something that I didn't properly document when I designed a few years earlier.
I always seem to underestimate just how much "future me" is capable of 
forgetting.
>
> at some point, having everything fit in a base CPU board without the expansion memory would simplify implementation.
Yes, and I was going to do that but I kept thinking that CPU RAM was at 
4000 (because it's lower) instead of 8000.  In the end I left things at 
4000 until I find out how it works elsewhere.

Thanks,

Denver

