Envelope-to: craig@sbc-85.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 10:57:00 -0600
Subject: Re: MBM V1.0 Boards
To: SBC-85 <craig@sbc-85.com>
References: <3992cc0f-08b6-b900-6279-91dca1ecee79@gmail.com>
 <3A1624E1-7D80-4F44-9E72-150275A923AB@sbc-85.com>
From: denverh <denverh2000@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ea30c6c0-9696-3f9f-ebae-264d5b66c43b@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 10:56:47 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/68.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.13
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3A1624E1-7D80-4F44-9E72-150275A923AB@sbc-85.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

SBC-85 wrote:
> Hi Denver
>
> Sorry for the confusion, it is not clear to me either.  Here is a photo of my v1.0  I can see the transistor Q1 is not oriented the same as the silkscreen.  I presume I actually had the wrong footprint, and changed the traces /pads.  You may need to ohm out to confirm
Yes, it looks like S & G need to be swapped.
>
> I think you ar3 right about the address photo  looking at the code, the Bible board is 8, the photo is 8, the description says 4.   I see a number of things I need to correct in the manual
>
> I think c43 and 43 were because the v1.0 board was not meeting intels spec for power decay rate.  The controller puts things in a safe state with enough power fail warning, so they have a specified decay rate.   So they are not critical.
>
> I didn’t see the comment about mounting the caps on their side.
It's in the assembly notes at the bottom of page 11.

Thanks,

Denver