Return-Path: <jan@rychter.com>
Delivered-To: craig@sbc-85.com
Received: from gator4254.hostgator.com
	by gator4254.hostgator.com with LMTP
	id cFLtBA0mDmP/VgAAcizydQ
	(envelope-from <jan@rychter.com>)
	for <craig@sbc-85.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:00:29 -0500
Return-path: <jan@rychter.com>
Envelope-to: craig@sbc-85.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:00:29 -0500
Received: from io.rychter.com ([136.243.145.218]:41896)
	by gator4254.hostgator.com with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.95)
	(envelope-from <jan@rychter.com>)
	id 1oT2j6-0006A7-KH
	for craig@sbc-85.com;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:00:29 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by io.rychter.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABFCA42C0
	for <craig@sbc-85.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from io.rychter.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (io.rychter.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id wyeaDyPSLoNq for <craig@sbc-85.com>;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:00:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (89-78-16-253.dynamic.chello.pl [89.78.16.253])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: jwr)
	by io.rychter.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A3D4A3B54
	for <craig@sbc-85.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:00:15 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=rychter.com; s=mail;
	t=1661871615; bh=yWanpVSbaV0daGUeK77pMP/1J3WTkgK+8itAl9hJcZQ=;
	h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=ZhB+h4OcNOKaeb6Kp7RnYkCgS294eiXykBnndA7zDbPLhAa3LgEL2vvJ7/hAB85nB
	 cB7NncuSVb8OSPk31Ci3f0YeDB7PWpCxrNO4gs+Ik2cm+/icp9I0KhG7Axz7NJKwda
	 0C/cgtSM+AYfHvqZjcVxw9qvXRRC5skiGGkm/UWvhvKoLTW9cCdKIW5GsEx2zH8RJz
	 q+IPQpJzpRVX9n9dItkH5H1cqR4FdGc/RwEfV0/6qv1eevs34GYdKYkhHtCA4WERvp
	 DcsrsMF9RxLl0SMgvdI3KyqyafqIAZ2loW1W59hWGJvjR/K38xy13DRyPjNQnDQ5QX
	 5QRpkbwF1Gr3g==
From: Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
Subject: Re: PartsBox feedback
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 17:00:14 +0200
References: <BdvapuJwIK64jA8boap2Q.1661215504212@postal.diode.partsbox.com>
To: craig@sbc-85.com
In-Reply-To: <BdvapuJwIK64jA8boap2Q.1661215504212@postal.diode.partsbox.com>
Message-Id: <09463A03-B6FB-4851-A83F-22106FE54212@rychter.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7
X-Spam-Score: -6
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-Spam-Flag: NO

Hi,

That's somewhat controversial, as some customers actually prefer those =
checkboxes to remain checked =E2=80=94 I'm thinking about adding a user =
preference for this behavior. I can certainly see the reasoning behind =
both leaving them checked and unchecking them.

best regards,
--Jan
  Founder, PartsBox =C2=B7 https://partsbox.com/



> On 22 Aug 2022, at 17:45, PartsBox Feedback <info@partsbox.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi
> performing actions on selected components is a very nice feature.
> However, when performing a function on selected components, it would =
be nice if the check boxes would clear themselves once successfully =
completed.  for example, select a number of components, then selected =
button and add tags.  then come back out and select components again and =
add tag.  currently, unless you notice that the last round of components =
is still selected, you wind up changing or adding more and more tags =
until you notice that all previous components are still selected.
> Thanks.
>=20
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, =
like Gecko) Chrome/104.0.5112.81 Safari/537.36 Edg/104.0.1293.54
>=20
> /cca/parts

